Use this category to improve the forum itself: a source we have misrepresented, an unclear explanation, missing context, an inaccessible link, or a barrier to taking part.
A useful first report: link the page or passage, say what prevents understanding or participation, and describe the smallest change that would help. A precise example is enough; you do not need to propose a complete redesign.
Our summaries are revisable accounts of the work. If one changes an essay’s argument, link the relevant passage and explain what has been lost or distorted. A correction should lead to a change in the account, with the reason preserved for later readers. This reflects the question raised in The Compression Problem of the Group Mind: can participants’ answers actually change what a collective says and does?
For a substantive philosophical objection, start in the questions and introductions thread, or choose a research track from the welcome. Keep model comparisons and results with the relevant sources and evidence. Use this category for the forum’s organization and participation process.
You can suggest a change without agreeing with the programme’s premises or volunteering for a larger task. The Love & Thermodynamics homepage and reading guide provide the wider context.